7. Gos
Saw 81
4 19.1.51
8. Goo
Saw 111 Conf
27.1.51
In Palman
D.G.C.A.
In Itall
(7). I take the wrend, with the Director of Audit that para 3(a)(ii) of
sofs's despatch
No. 302 of 24.9.48
the so
(copy attached) must be read as that all seepplementary
m
expenditure in excess of the limits. stated must be referred back for the S. IS's approval; and that therefore, when a supplementary provision
excess
in
the limits laid down has been approved all for ther Supplementary provisions
are
under
the
the same head, even though they
for amounts less than limits laid down, must also be referred back for approval. I
we showed reply to (7)
suggest
that
on these lines at the
same time
giving covering approval for the purticular supplementary provisions of $250,000 which has brought this point up. The point dealt with in para 4
"O) has been
disposed of
Crossea.
in (5) with which (7)
(8). We cannot I thenik object to the expenditure, parketilarly the present
when we
consider
Ciumstances of story Kang.
!
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.